← Back to context Comment by smoothjazz 3 years ago [removed] 5 comments smoothjazz Reply bawolff 3 years ago No, that was from south africa's request. That wasn't the wording the court used in its decision smoothjazz 3 years ago [removed] bawolff 3 years ago Do you mean from page 2? Because that is the court just saying what each side requested. The actual order that the court gave is much later in the document. 1 reply → layer8 3 years ago Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39146853.
bawolff 3 years ago No, that was from south africa's request. That wasn't the wording the court used in its decision smoothjazz 3 years ago [removed] bawolff 3 years ago Do you mean from page 2? Because that is the court just saying what each side requested. The actual order that the court gave is much later in the document. 1 reply → layer8 3 years ago Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39146853.
smoothjazz 3 years ago [removed] bawolff 3 years ago Do you mean from page 2? Because that is the court just saying what each side requested. The actual order that the court gave is much later in the document. 1 reply → layer8 3 years ago Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39146853.
bawolff 3 years ago Do you mean from page 2? Because that is the court just saying what each side requested. The actual order that the court gave is much later in the document. 1 reply →
No, that was from south africa's request. That wasn't the wording the court used in its decision
[removed]
Do you mean from page 2? Because that is the court just saying what each side requested. The actual order that the court gave is much later in the document.
1 reply →
Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39146853.