Comment by JumpCrisscross
3 years ago
> Interesting perspective for a former judge
Do you have a link to Barak’s dissent on those questions?
3 years ago
> Interesting perspective for a former judge
Do you have a link to Barak’s dissent on those questions?
https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192...
Hmm, the relevant meat appears in paragraph 43. One one point, he votes against because it’s redundant to the Convention. Fair enough. On the other, a question of “plausibility,” comes up, which seems a term of art I wasn’t able to quickly decipher.