Comment by belter
1 year ago
> far more valuable than HN + Reddit + Facebook combined
What do you learn from 280 characters at a time?
1 year ago
> far more valuable than HN + Reddit + Facebook combined
What do you learn from 280 characters at a time?
The 280 character limit was raised to 4,000 in February of 2023.
Only for people who pay.
Mostly I follow artists who post pictures, so the character limit doesn't matter.
[flagged]
Tweeting screenshots of text demonstrates how poor a platform Twitter is, IMO. A core feature -- sharing text -- must sometimes be done in the least efficient way possible, as an image or a series of tweets (that can only be viewed while signed in).
> must sometimes be done in the least efficient way possible, as an image or a series of tweets
Try tiktok and instagram, they’re to kids these days what twitter was to us 10 years ago. There’s a huge trend on those platforms of people sharing a single tweet as a 20s video with a face grimacing and pointing at the text as commentary.
Literally 280char of content turned into a 20s full screen selfie video.
There's also a much higher character limit for paying users, so you can post an entire essay in a tweet now. Look at basically everything Bill Ackman[1] posts, for example.
[1] https://twitter.com/BillAckman
Yep exactly, that too!
You are being really defensive for no reason...
"Yeah, the best content is on twitter, you have everything from links to Medium to links to personal websites, sometimes there's even screenshots of them!"
You know how Stallman browses the web by emailing a scraper that replies only the text? And he avoids all the Medium flurry of popups and overlays and trackers and cookies and other rubbish?
Seeing a screenshot of the text in Twitter accidentally does that too, and provides a better experience than visiting the site for anyone who doesn't need to customise the text for readability.
[flagged]
1 reply →