Comment by crotchfire
2 years ago
This supposes that there's some naturally-right size for a corporation to be
No, in fact, it doesn't. Please re-read the comment you're replying to.
There is no cutoff, limit, or threshhold. It doesn't prescribe a naturally-right size any more than a graduated income tax "prescribes a naturally-right amount of income".
Is a 'cap' not a 'cutoff, limit, or threshold'?
Please read the comment again; you have not understood it.
No cap is proposed.
No but you have to pick where and how quickly to ramp the tax schedule which will eventually lead to you having to make some “assumptions” about what size (range) is “too big”
1 reply →
Yes, in fact, it does. The objection just flies directly into the blindspot which leads you to make the proposal in the first place, which produces cognitive dissonance. You postulate, incorrectly, that "too large" is a coherent concept for corporations, and propose to "fix" your imaginary problem by punishing people who grow corporations larger than your imagined ideal.