Comment by exe34

> Not at a technical level, yeah, but intuitively, it is possible to get general understandings way beyond his attempts at answering that question.

The issue with giving people an intuitive model that's not at the same level of complexity to the mathematical models, in my experience, is that a lot of people, including out-of-field experts then run with the intuitive model into bizarre territory and treat it as a prediction of the original tested theory. They reason correctly within the simplified world of the analogy but when it clashes with the real world, they dig down and reaffirm their preconceived notions.

On the other hand, I suppose they were never going to honour Cromwell's rule anyway, so maybe it doesn't matter.