Look we all know governments can do some crazy things and regulatory capture is awful, but you libertarian types really have some strange ideas about regulation.
Half of this forum would be out of a job if it wasn't for Google, but still they down vote my comment and demand government regulation. They have no clue what they're in for. While Google has it flaws – big flaws – at least for the most they give anybody a chance to compete in the results ranking. A government regulated search engine or web portal won't be anything like that.
> Half of this forum would be out of a job if it wasn't for Google
This is similar to the Great man theory. If there wasn't for google there would be something else. Maybe something similar maybe something totally different. The idea that half of us would be sitting on our ass doing nothing if it weren't for google is just nonsense.
> Half of this forum would be out of a job if it wasn't for Google
Hahaha wat.
> still they down vote my comment and demand government regulation. They have no clue what they're in for.
Oh, we do have a clue. We have close to two centuries [1] of data to draw from. Corporations and big companies will always go for the worst possible things and are only reigned in when the government steps in. Without fail.
> at least for the most they give anybody a chance to compete in the results ranking.
No, they don't. And they haven't done this for a very long time now.
[1] Well, more. Government regulations are as old as governments, but let's take the last two centuries as something resembling more modern capitalism.
Look we all know governments can do some crazy things and regulatory capture is awful, but you libertarian types really have some strange ideas about regulation.
Half of this forum would be out of a job if it wasn't for Google, but still they down vote my comment and demand government regulation. They have no clue what they're in for. While Google has it flaws – big flaws – at least for the most they give anybody a chance to compete in the results ranking. A government regulated search engine or web portal won't be anything like that.
> Half of this forum would be out of a job if it wasn't for Google
This is similar to the Great man theory. If there wasn't for google there would be something else. Maybe something similar maybe something totally different. The idea that half of us would be sitting on our ass doing nothing if it weren't for google is just nonsense.
1 reply →
> Half of this forum would be out of a job if it wasn't for Google
Hahaha wat.
> still they down vote my comment and demand government regulation. They have no clue what they're in for.
Oh, we do have a clue. We have close to two centuries [1] of data to draw from. Corporations and big companies will always go for the worst possible things and are only reigned in when the government steps in. Without fail.
> at least for the most they give anybody a chance to compete in the results ranking.
No, they don't. And they haven't done this for a very long time now.
[1] Well, more. Government regulations are as old as governments, but let's take the last two centuries as something resembling more modern capitalism.
4 replies →
It would be probably better to just ban the «too big to fail» ones.
Regulations tend to only help them at the expense of smaller competitors.
[flagged]