← Back to context Comment by stavros 2 years ago Sure, but there's no backtick in the GP's comment. Only an apostrophe. 5 comments stavros Reply godelski 2 years ago Wait what? I see,comma-backtick` whereas I wrote ,comma-apostrophe'I copy pasted both btw. You see them both as '? I see GP as having ` and me having 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backtick stavros 2 years ago tcmb used ‚comma-apostrophe‘. nsxwolf asked "Is ,comma-backtick` some personal quirk of yours, or is it some standard I'm not aware of?"I'm pointing out that nsxwolf was wrong to ask about comma-backtick, because tcmb used comma-apostrophe. roryokane 2 years ago Both are wrong. tcmb didn’t use ‚comma-apostrophe’ – they opened with , U+201A SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (not U+002C COMMA) and closed with ‘ U+2018 LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK (otherwise known as an open single quotation mark).This matches the German convention described on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark#German. 2 replies →
godelski 2 years ago Wait what? I see,comma-backtick` whereas I wrote ,comma-apostrophe'I copy pasted both btw. You see them both as '? I see GP as having ` and me having 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backtick stavros 2 years ago tcmb used ‚comma-apostrophe‘. nsxwolf asked "Is ,comma-backtick` some personal quirk of yours, or is it some standard I'm not aware of?"I'm pointing out that nsxwolf was wrong to ask about comma-backtick, because tcmb used comma-apostrophe. roryokane 2 years ago Both are wrong. tcmb didn’t use ‚comma-apostrophe’ – they opened with , U+201A SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (not U+002C COMMA) and closed with ‘ U+2018 LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK (otherwise known as an open single quotation mark).This matches the German convention described on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark#German. 2 replies →
stavros 2 years ago tcmb used ‚comma-apostrophe‘. nsxwolf asked "Is ,comma-backtick` some personal quirk of yours, or is it some standard I'm not aware of?"I'm pointing out that nsxwolf was wrong to ask about comma-backtick, because tcmb used comma-apostrophe. roryokane 2 years ago Both are wrong. tcmb didn’t use ‚comma-apostrophe’ – they opened with , U+201A SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (not U+002C COMMA) and closed with ‘ U+2018 LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK (otherwise known as an open single quotation mark).This matches the German convention described on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark#German. 2 replies →
roryokane 2 years ago Both are wrong. tcmb didn’t use ‚comma-apostrophe’ – they opened with , U+201A SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (not U+002C COMMA) and closed with ‘ U+2018 LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK (otherwise known as an open single quotation mark).This matches the German convention described on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark#German. 2 replies →
Wait what? I see
,comma-backtick` whereas I wrote ,comma-apostrophe'
I copy pasted both btw. You see them both as '? I see GP as having ` and me having '
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backtick
tcmb used ‚comma-apostrophe‘. nsxwolf asked "Is ,comma-backtick` some personal quirk of yours, or is it some standard I'm not aware of?"
I'm pointing out that nsxwolf was wrong to ask about comma-backtick, because tcmb used comma-apostrophe.
Both are wrong. tcmb didn’t use ‚comma-apostrophe’ – they opened with , U+201A SINGLE LOW-9 QUOTATION MARK (not U+002C COMMA) and closed with ‘ U+2018 LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK (otherwise known as an open single quotation mark).
This matches the German convention described on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark#German.
2 replies →