Comment by afavour
1 year ago
I do think there’s an interesting future dilemma here. I’m absolutely against them sharing this data without consent. But if sharing e.g. the number of hard brakes you do was made explicit and led to lower insurance premiums… I’d be tempted. I often feel like there’s little reward for adhering to traffic laws these days.
And when your mechanic diagnoses a brake problem on an empty road behind their shop, and it raises your rates, how will you feel?
That logic quickly turns into a stupid word game.
What's the difference between a reward for sharing data on your hard stops vs a penalty for not sharing data on hard stops?
There used to be opt-in insurance programs with many carriers. They used to send you a device, but I guess that was mooted by secret mass surveillance?
I hear ads regularly for Progressive's version of this.
I believe Allstate has one that uses your mobile phone to do it.
> led to lower insurance premiums
Maybe it would be lower relative to other people's rates, but one must imagine that any insurance prices will only ever cost more to the consumer.
This is not how capitalism works. However, if insurance were priced perfectly, it would cease to be useful!
Not really. Accidents are a function of driver and environment. You can't control the other drivers. If you think of the primary purpose of insurance as to make sure that the party not at fault is made whole, then perfectly priced insurance becomes like posting a bond in order to drive. Which isn't unreasonable.
(Plus uninsured motorist coverage for the other parts you can't control, which really is an insurance function.)