Comment by jedimind

it's amusing how you can miss his point so badly and still think that's he is wrong and not you for applying a false analogy and making the false conclusion.

The example you mentioned is fundamentally different, why? The owner has the option to completely disable anything they dislike or install a different OS, especially on linux which prides itself on maximum user choice. And even then it's asinine to compare features that are for enhanced security and Apple's version of "security" which just limits user choice to products that have to pass Apple's gate so they have to pay a tax to enrich Apple.