Comment by andy99
7 months ago
I stopped reading once I realized it was just a rant about their business. Why would I care? Their search is better, it's worth what I pay, if it stops being worth the money I'll stop paying. I could care less how their business is run. If I was investing I might look closer, until then, the maximum I have at risk is the $100 or so it costs a year, which I'm comfortable with. Did I miss something more damning later in the article?
> Did I miss something more damning later in the article?
Yes. The part where the CEO claims that of all the people seeking anonymity that less than 100 of them aren’t criminals o_O
Check out the last discord screenshot.
The comment is weird but I think it's out of context. I don't want to defend it but also don't think it particularly affects me as a Kagi user.
I completely agree. I use products because they're useful, not because I'm invested (financially or emotionally) in the business creating said product.
[flagged]
> I had Claude3 read it for claims about quality, security, privacy. It found none.
You might want to consider actually reading things for yourself, rather than assuming the magic robots are telling the truth (the magic robot did not tell you the truth, here).
[flagged]
I had ChatGPT read your comment and asked it "Is this a useful methodology of evaluating articles?"
It cautioned me that "it's important to recognize the limitations of such tools" and said:
> Tools like Claude3 may struggle with understanding the context of certain claims or the overall tone and intent of the article. They might flag statements that are not actually problematic or miss important context that affects the interpretation of claims.
Try some other AI. Maybe Clause couldn't read text in the screenshots.
No, don't try some other AI, actually read things, bloody hell.