Comment by dgellow 2 years ago Is it similar to Zig’s callconv keyword? 2 comments dgellow Reply vrotaru 2 years ago Guess so. Unfamiliar with Zig. The point is that not a "all or nothing" strategy for a compilation unit.Debugger writers may not be happy, but maybe lldb supports all conventions supported by llvm. int_19h 2 years ago Debugger writers have dealt with different calling conventions for decades. The notion predates C even. They can handle it just fine.
vrotaru 2 years ago Guess so. Unfamiliar with Zig. The point is that not a "all or nothing" strategy for a compilation unit.Debugger writers may not be happy, but maybe lldb supports all conventions supported by llvm. int_19h 2 years ago Debugger writers have dealt with different calling conventions for decades. The notion predates C even. They can handle it just fine.
int_19h 2 years ago Debugger writers have dealt with different calling conventions for decades. The notion predates C even. They can handle it just fine.
Guess so. Unfamiliar with Zig. The point is that not a "all or nothing" strategy for a compilation unit.
Debugger writers may not be happy, but maybe lldb supports all conventions supported by llvm.
Debugger writers have dealt with different calling conventions for decades. The notion predates C even. They can handle it just fine.