Comment by geor9e
8 months ago
https://www.mic.com/articles/85987/turkish-protesters-are-sp...
Repressive governments have a history of legal orders telling Google to block protestors from accessing twitter.com but Google always refuses to comply. So their new policy of complying isn't about legality. France is a big market. Perhaps it's about money.
France is not a big market for Google.
The entire ad revenue market (desktop + mobile + social + ....) in France, in 2023, was 5.8 billion dollars (The spread in public sources data seems to be 5.0billion-6.2 billion, so i just took the high side)
1. Google made over $240 billion in ad revenue in 2023, so even if it had 100% of all ads revenue in France, France would only account for 2.5% of Google's revenue.
2. However, Google's share in France is nowhere close to 100%. Search + Display overall is currently sitting at 20-25% of the french ad revenue above (same sources). Let's assume Google has 100% market share in France in those areas.
Then France would account for about 1.25 billion dollars of revenue for google, or about 0.5 percent of Google's revenue. Which is not a lot.
But it's still something. Or it would be, except:
3. France has fined Google 224 million so far in 2024.
Google's margins are around 25%. So that 1.25 billion of revenue produces around 312.5 million of profit. Maybe less
Of which they've been fined 224 million :)
If Google gets fined in France again this year, it would probably be operating at a loss.
Uh, there's nothing in your link about a government ordering Google to block Twitter? Since you say this is a common occurence, I'm guessing it'll be easy for you to find a source that actually supports your claim.
I think the main point is that it's trivial for people to circumvent the DNS level block by simply finding new DNS servers (in this case something other than local ISPs, Google, CF etc... still many out there) by asking others or simple googling here and there, and in extreme cases, at a physical level as in the article.
I don't understand where you got that "main point" from; nothing in the GP's comment is about that or anything tangential to that.
1 reply →