Comment by JackSlateur
8 months ago
Technically, google did it right (using the "censored" error code: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8914#name-extended-...):
root@jack:~# dig footybite.cc @8.8.8.8
; <<>> DiG 9.18.19-1~deb12u1-Debian <<>> footybite.cc
@8.8.8.8
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: REFUSED, id: 14528
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0,
ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
; EDE: 16 (Censored): (The requested domain is on a court
ordered copyright piracy blocklist for FR (ISO country
code). To learn more about this specific removal, please
visit https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41606068.)
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;footybite.cc. IN A
;; Query time: 7 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Sun Jun 16 19:24:29 CEST 2024
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 243
Technically interesting but unless browsers start showing the error to the user about 0% of affected users will benefit from this.