Comment by panja 2 years ago I hate that everyone just develops for chromium only 11 comments panja Reply darren_ 2 years ago This site works fine in safari/mobile safari, it is not ‘chromium only’ hawski 2 years ago WebKit and its derivatives then. mcny 2 years ago I tried it with FIrefox 127 (production) and it worked just fine for me even though there is a huge banner on the top. RockRobotRock 2 years ago Mozilla refuses to implement some really cool standards.https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/That, and their shitty management shakes my faith in Firefox the8472 2 years ago They're not necessarily standards. I clicked on the first negative one and it said draft.One browser vendor proposing things other vendor NAKing it makes it a vendor-specific feature. Like IE had its own features. RockRobotRock 2 years ago Yeah but we’re trying to fight against browser engine superiority, aren’t we?I hate using chrome, but I’m forced to with any application that uses we busb/web serial or Bluetooth. 2 replies → 93po 2 years ago You prefer the management of Chromium, which makes billions a year from invading your privacy and force feeding you advertising, while also ruining the internet ecosystem? RockRobotRock 2 years ago Yes, me lightly criticizing Mozilla means that I endorse Google. Fuck off Bluestein 2 years ago A shame. They used to be the free (freedom) option.-
darren_ 2 years ago This site works fine in safari/mobile safari, it is not ‘chromium only’ hawski 2 years ago WebKit and its derivatives then. mcny 2 years ago I tried it with FIrefox 127 (production) and it worked just fine for me even though there is a huge banner on the top.
hawski 2 years ago WebKit and its derivatives then. mcny 2 years ago I tried it with FIrefox 127 (production) and it worked just fine for me even though there is a huge banner on the top.
mcny 2 years ago I tried it with FIrefox 127 (production) and it worked just fine for me even though there is a huge banner on the top.
RockRobotRock 2 years ago Mozilla refuses to implement some really cool standards.https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/That, and their shitty management shakes my faith in Firefox the8472 2 years ago They're not necessarily standards. I clicked on the first negative one and it said draft.One browser vendor proposing things other vendor NAKing it makes it a vendor-specific feature. Like IE had its own features. RockRobotRock 2 years ago Yeah but we’re trying to fight against browser engine superiority, aren’t we?I hate using chrome, but I’m forced to with any application that uses we busb/web serial or Bluetooth. 2 replies → 93po 2 years ago You prefer the management of Chromium, which makes billions a year from invading your privacy and force feeding you advertising, while also ruining the internet ecosystem? RockRobotRock 2 years ago Yes, me lightly criticizing Mozilla means that I endorse Google. Fuck off Bluestein 2 years ago A shame. They used to be the free (freedom) option.-
the8472 2 years ago They're not necessarily standards. I clicked on the first negative one and it said draft.One browser vendor proposing things other vendor NAKing it makes it a vendor-specific feature. Like IE had its own features. RockRobotRock 2 years ago Yeah but we’re trying to fight against browser engine superiority, aren’t we?I hate using chrome, but I’m forced to with any application that uses we busb/web serial or Bluetooth. 2 replies →
RockRobotRock 2 years ago Yeah but we’re trying to fight against browser engine superiority, aren’t we?I hate using chrome, but I’m forced to with any application that uses we busb/web serial or Bluetooth. 2 replies →
93po 2 years ago You prefer the management of Chromium, which makes billions a year from invading your privacy and force feeding you advertising, while also ruining the internet ecosystem? RockRobotRock 2 years ago Yes, me lightly criticizing Mozilla means that I endorse Google. Fuck off
This site works fine in safari/mobile safari, it is not ‘chromium only’
WebKit and its derivatives then.
I tried it with FIrefox 127 (production) and it worked just fine for me even though there is a huge banner on the top.
Mozilla refuses to implement some really cool standards.
https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/
That, and their shitty management shakes my faith in Firefox
They're not necessarily standards. I clicked on the first negative one and it said draft.
One browser vendor proposing things other vendor NAKing it makes it a vendor-specific feature. Like IE had its own features.
Yeah but we’re trying to fight against browser engine superiority, aren’t we?
I hate using chrome, but I’m forced to with any application that uses we busb/web serial or Bluetooth.
2 replies →
You prefer the management of Chromium, which makes billions a year from invading your privacy and force feeding you advertising, while also ruining the internet ecosystem?
Yes, me lightly criticizing Mozilla means that I endorse Google. Fuck off
A shame. They used to be the free (freedom) option.-