Comment by bradley_taunt
8 months ago
Love the project, but that website is pretty cold and soulless (as mentioned by others).
I quickly put together a "cleaner" design for anyone interested, which also uses the original (and objectively better) logo:
Hard disagree. If you're a fan of the strictly functional "what's CSS?" look, you might as well stick to viewing README.md on GitHub and call it a day.
This design makes it look like something that is looking for developer contributions. The original looks like something where a sales chatbot is likely to pop up in the corner.
I love this version SO MUCH BETTER. Clean, easy to read and I don't have to scroll down for half an hour to get to the bottom. I hate "modern design", whatever it is. To much padding, to much useless css and styles.
The original sure looks bland, but a HTML4-esque webpage gives absolutely the wrong message about the maturity level of a browser regardless of how much more usable it may be. Branding matters even if it's a tough pill to swallow.
1. "cold and soulless"
2. gives black text white background
3. now its "clean(er)"
4. "also your old logo is objectively better"
This isn't design work.
This version is clearly superior, both in design and use. Great start!
Maybe it's because they want their website to work in their own browser ;)? I can see that if they start off simple with the browser, they start off simple with the website too, and it progressively grows with the browser.
What? The redesign is way simpler than the original website.
Yeah, that original logo is way better. Kind of reminiscent of the Firefox logo before it got abstracted away into minimalism.
Interesting, as the icon present on the parent user's site seems to be an even earlier, less refined (and clearly AI generated) version than the prior iteration[1] before changing to the abstract design.
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20240208004519im_/https://ladybi...