Comment by p_l
2 years ago
Essentially, attribute names directly specify the attribute type - so $SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR declared the entry in FILE attribute list to be a security descriptor. DATA attributes have another name field to handle multiple instances
> Essentially, attribute names directly specify the attribute type - so $SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR declared the entry in FILE attribute list to be a security descriptor. DATA attributes have another name field to handle multiple instances
If you at the Linux kernel source code, `fs/ntfs3/ntfs.h` contains the following:
So the name field isn't specific to `$DATA` attributes, every attribute has it. However, for most attributes either the name is zero bytes, or it is a hardcoded name (like `$I30` for directories). Is `$DATA` the only one that can have different instances of the attribute with arbitrary names?
Arguably from the point of On Disk Structure (to reuse terminology from NTFS' ancestor in VMS), all attributes can have names as well.
Now, implementation in ntfs.sys is another thing and I have no idea if it's just an unused code path or if something would explode, and from what I heard Microsoft ended up in situation where people are scared to touch it not because of code quality but because of being scared of breaking something.
> Now, implementation in ntfs.sys is another thing and I have no idea if it's just an unused code path or if something would explode,
ntfs.sys has validation checks in it which prevent you from directly creating anything other than named or unnamed $DATA attributes on a regular file, and named $DATA attributes on a directory, and (indirectly) creating other stuff (directories, file names, standard attributes, EAs) through the appropriate APIs. If you try to do anything funky, you'll get an "Access Denied" error code returned by ntfs.sys
2 replies →
I see. So there's one more layer of indirection there that I'm missing.