Comment by mschuster91
2 years ago
> This is a contradiction in TicketMaster’s marketing. They can’t have robust DRM on their tickets if those tickets can still be viewed offline.
The "robust DRM" is called "ID cards". Here in Europe, it's become commonplace to tie soccer tickets to ID cards that are verified at the gates to keep hooligans (or those suspected of being hooligans, which is a status that is way WAY easier obtainable than one might reasonably assume) out, and high-class events that attract scalpers like a pile of dungs attracts flies have been doing that for even longer.
Huh, weird, a turns out an old, low-tech solution is much more secure than Ticketmaster's roll-your-own weird TOT-QR "security" (even considering the magic animation that that makes it "in a sense, alive")
(Not that requiring ID doesn't raise the same and also other consumer rights issues)
The thing is, unlike most of Europe, the US doesn't have a legal mandate for anyone to possess an ID card, and so in practice you got 50 states worth of driver's licenses, library cards, military or government employment IDs that can be used (or faked)... so you can't really use these for legitimately verifying anything unless you want to spend a lot of time and money to train your staff to spot fakes. Banks can do that but no one wants to do that for the goons that run security at venues for minimum wage.
Sure, but realistically no one is going to get a fake ID with a certain name on it so they can go to a concert with that person's tickets.
3 replies →
How hard is it to get access to a database to confirm that a scanned ID is valid, and corresponds to the name written on it?
3 replies →
>They can’t have robust DRM on their tickets if those tickets can still be viewed offline.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_Computing