Comment by mmsc

2 years ago

>This is such an enormous attack vector for all organizations that use GitHub that we’re introducing a new term: Cross Fork Object Reference (CFOR)

Have we stopped naming vulnerabilities cute and fuzzy names and started inventing class names instead? Does this have a logo? Has this issue been identified anywhere else?

4 comments

mmsc

Reply
booi  2 years ago

Introducing a new vulnerability... Git Forked™!

chatgpt: Create a logo image of a fork impaling a small gnome named "code"

  • riiii  2 years ago

    Much better name.

    It's very formally called Cross Fork Object Reference (CFOR). But commonly known as Git Forked! (Including the exclamation mark).

quectophoton  2 years ago

Best I could come up with after thinking for a moment is "AGHAST": "Astonishing GitHub Availability (of) Source Trees".

But I'm still not entirely satisfied with the word choice.