Comment by troupo
1 year ago
> Emacs `M-x sql-connect` is much easier for me to do than to look up, in VS Code, what shortcut has been assigned to the extension I use
And the knowledge of `M-x sql-connect` came to you how? In a dream? Commands in Emacs are undiscoverable unless you know what to look for.
> Each time I want to do something in the IDE I switch focus from the code to the IDE. When in Vim or Emacs, that never happens!
No. It happens only because you're used to Emacs and Vim, and unused to an IDE.
> So that’s what days were like. A bunch of tiny frustrations, and a bunch of tiny successes. But they added up.
And those frustrations are rampant in the Emacs/Vim world. People pretend they are not there because of this false notion that only those two are the sign of a great programmer.
By the time I've done my coding, project-wide refactoring, and looked up half of a project's code most Emacsers/Vimers are still stuck trying to find all references with a full-text search.
There's a reason VSCode's LSP took the world by storm
> And the knowledge of `M-x sql-connect` came to you how? In a dream? Commands in Emacs are undiscoverable unless you know what to look for.
It's one command that implements autocomplete which gives you access to the entire system.
> It happens only because you're used to Emacs and Vim,
That's my entire point! I learned the majority of Emacs and Vim commands well back in the mid-90s.
> and unused to an IDE.
Objectively not true, if you had read the entire comment.
> People pretend they are not there because of this false notion that only those two are the sign of a great programmer.
I think you have a chip on your shoulder about this. You read my post as some sort of attack on IDEs so responded with an attack of your own.
My point was about little frictions all adding up. Sure, there's a steep learning curve in learning a programmable editor, but you only climb that curve once.
It just takes much less memory to remember 4 verbs and maybe 6 nouns in Vim to perform navigation, than learning 4x6=24 shortcuts for similar functionality in Jetbrains/Eclipse/Vs/VSCode/etc.
I'm just explaining why needing to remember fewer things is the path of least resistance for me; whatever argument you are talking about involving signs of great programmers is beyond the scope of what I am saying.
> It's one command that implements
And you know this command how? You discovered it how?
> That's my entire point! I learned the majority of Emacs and Vim commands well back in the mid-90s.
Indeed. And now you complain about friction in IDEs because you refuse to learn IDEs to the same extent.
> My point was about little frictions all adding up.
Yes, yes they do. And I find there are significantly more frictions in Emacs and Vim than in a modern IDE. The only reason you don't see them is that you've already learned Emacs/Vim
> It just takes much less memory to remember 4 verbs and maybe 6 nouns in Vim to perform navigation, than learning 4x6=24 shortcuts
Wat. I don't even know what these random numbers mean, and where you got them from. And how we went from functionality and capabilities to navigation.
> I'm just explaining why needing to remember fewer things
Thing is, you don't remember "fewer things" with Emacs/Vim. You end up remembering about the same, or greater number of things on top of significantly worse functionality.
Like you pretend that remembering dozens of various commands to type into `M-x` is somehow easier, and requires less memory than remembering the common shortcuts for common actions and falling back to Cmd+P(VS Code)/Cmd+Shift+A(Intelli J) to look up actions you rarely use.
Why the antagonism? Programmable editors don't work for you, fine.
Why make personal attacks on me, like this:
> you pretend that
I'm not pretending anything.
> Thing is, you don't remember "fewer things" with Emacs/Vim. You end up remembering about the same, or greater number of things
Not true. Like I said, I use an IDE daily, and there's much more to remember to get the same functionality that I get out of (for example) Vim. It's easier for me to remember (for example) 10 nouns that can be combined with 10 verbs than to memorise 100 shortcuts.
You may find it easier to memorise 100 shortcuts rather than 10 verbs and 10 nouns, but I am certainly not pretending when I tell you that I find it easier to remember 20 things rather than 100 things.
3 replies →
> > It just takes much less memory to remember 4 verbs and maybe 6 nouns in Vim to perform navigation, than learning 4x6=24 shortcuts
> Thing is, you don't remember "fewer things" with Emacs/Vim. You end up remembering about the same, or greater number of things on top of significantly worse functionality.
You don't understand vim yet you confidently state that it requires remembering more things. vim is like a language. You do not memorize entire English sentences when you choose to communicate with someone, it's the same in vim. You do not memorize how to do do something, but rather the grammar/verbs/nouns.
If you know that 'd' is the verb for deleting, and that 'w' is the motion for 'word', you can combine them into 'dw' to delete until the end of the word. When you later learn that '$' takes you to the end of the line, you know that you can do 'd$' to delete until the end of the line. You do not need to memorize 'd$' and 'dw' individually, just the motions and actions separately.
The same applies to actions, when you learn that y is yank (copy), you can apply the same 'w' and '$' motions in that cases to copy until the end of the word/line. That is what the poster means about verbs and nouns. Vim isn't discoverable, you cannot learn to use it without reading. But it is the most logically consistent "editing language" I have personally seen (alongside kakoune/helix).
You are also mixing up many concepts in your arguments. You can get LSP in vim/emacs and you can get vim-ish hotkeys in popular IDE's. The topic of this thread, Zed, is pretty vimmy and is closer to vs-code than it is to vim.
1 reply →