Comment by kyriakos 1 year ago They can fork Chromium instead. Doesn't mean Firefox is the best base to start. 4 comments kyriakos Reply PaulHoule 1 year ago … and there are many Chromium forks out there. For web standards to really be standards and not “Chromium” there has to be a viable non-Chromium browser. miah_ 1 year ago The illusion of choice:You can have any color car as long as its black. I mean you can run any browser you want, as long as its Chrome. kyriakos 1 year ago If Firefox had 90% of the market would it be a choice? idonotknowwhy 1 year ago Yes, because Mozilla can't force is onto it by making google finance and YouTube run like shit on competing browsers
PaulHoule 1 year ago … and there are many Chromium forks out there. For web standards to really be standards and not “Chromium” there has to be a viable non-Chromium browser.
miah_ 1 year ago The illusion of choice:You can have any color car as long as its black. I mean you can run any browser you want, as long as its Chrome. kyriakos 1 year ago If Firefox had 90% of the market would it be a choice? idonotknowwhy 1 year ago Yes, because Mozilla can't force is onto it by making google finance and YouTube run like shit on competing browsers
kyriakos 1 year ago If Firefox had 90% of the market would it be a choice? idonotknowwhy 1 year ago Yes, because Mozilla can't force is onto it by making google finance and YouTube run like shit on competing browsers
idonotknowwhy 1 year ago Yes, because Mozilla can't force is onto it by making google finance and YouTube run like shit on competing browsers
… and there are many Chromium forks out there. For web standards to really be standards and not “Chromium” there has to be a viable non-Chromium browser.
The illusion of choice:
You can have any color car as long as its black. I mean you can run any browser you want, as long as its Chrome.
If Firefox had 90% of the market would it be a choice?
Yes, because Mozilla can't force is onto it by making google finance and YouTube run like shit on competing browsers