Comment by block_dagger 1 year ago This is pretty close to Matz’s stance as well. 2 comments block_dagger Reply mahatofu 1 year ago Personally, the argument for strong types is when you’re writing critical foreseeably permanent architecture. It’s an extra layer of security and explanation. hu3 1 year ago For me, a sensible use of types helps reducing cognitive load during development.It also help with autocomplete and linting.
mahatofu 1 year ago Personally, the argument for strong types is when you’re writing critical foreseeably permanent architecture. It’s an extra layer of security and explanation. hu3 1 year ago For me, a sensible use of types helps reducing cognitive load during development.It also help with autocomplete and linting.
hu3 1 year ago For me, a sensible use of types helps reducing cognitive load during development.It also help with autocomplete and linting.
Personally, the argument for strong types is when you’re writing critical foreseeably permanent architecture. It’s an extra layer of security and explanation.
For me, a sensible use of types helps reducing cognitive load during development.
It also help with autocomplete and linting.