Comment by Jerrrrrrry
2 years ago
nope.
FUD.
Diffie Hellman, Homomorphic encryption, zero knowledge proofs, decentralized triple (sender, messenger, receiver) layered protocol.
Faraday caged, deafened power supply, Heartbeat/pulse sensors, proximity sensors, voltage sensors, EM/radio triggers, dead-man switch, all reporting with constantly rotating codes.
Multiple servers in different locations, depending on threat model because of jurisdiction, with XOR'd secrets, with random access to memory to obfuscate the real address if it needs zeroed/oned/zeroed, Da Vinci codex style.
Make access directly tied to reputation/staked interest/invitation, with subtle canaries and watermarks.
Even if it got super-chilled and no noticeable voltage disruption, and someone didn't set off any other alarm bells, they still have to get the other machine within the timeout.
And you could just do 3/5 multi-sig, and apply CAP theorem.
But if the best people in the world can't do it ("for more than a year"), then there is something less than ideal in the above hypothetical.
I am (or was, at this point) a cryptographer.
Throwing random cryptography buzzwords at a problem does not magically create a secure solution.
Even if you had a genie to give you all of this, you’d absolutely want to include and build upon the work Apple is doing here.
no but any more words between those naughty ones and im pushing my quota
TIFU, handshake, auth between two+ parties
Doesnt publicly exist in a useful manner; any implementations likely will be ITAR'd or NIST'd moled. allows verifiable, but anonymous computation, trust-less computing,
like tor/i2p/other "pony express" decentralized trustless transport protocols - pass on what you cannot decrypt.
^forgot to add bluetooth / orientation / volume kill-switches for physical security.
lets not joke the culture, they are the best at math
ive described a modern da vinci codex and you think itd be better in a safe to be reverse-engineered.