Comment by subarctic 2 years ago is it better than ffmpeg in any way? 3 comments subarctic Reply jammmety 2 years ago Apple's AAC encoders are often touted as being the 'best', quality-wise: https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,119876.0.html lozf 2 years ago As jammmety said; for AAC encoding yes, but don't worry - you can have ffmpeg use that encoder to get the best of both. FabHK 2 years ago afconvert is the only way I've managed to turn mp3s into something that Books would accept as an audiobook. afconvert -v -s 3 -f m4bf ....mp3
jammmety 2 years ago Apple's AAC encoders are often touted as being the 'best', quality-wise: https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,119876.0.html
lozf 2 years ago As jammmety said; for AAC encoding yes, but don't worry - you can have ffmpeg use that encoder to get the best of both.
FabHK 2 years ago afconvert is the only way I've managed to turn mp3s into something that Books would accept as an audiobook. afconvert -v -s 3 -f m4bf ....mp3
Apple's AAC encoders are often touted as being the 'best', quality-wise: https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,119876.0.html
As jammmety said; for AAC encoding yes, but don't worry - you can have ffmpeg use that encoder to get the best of both.
afconvert is the only way I've managed to turn mp3s into something that Books would accept as an audiobook.