Comment by abc-1
1 year ago
> I have shipped a lot of different projects over the last ~10 years in tech. I often get tapped to lead new ones when it’s important to get it right, because I’m good at it.
Why not list some of them that I can actually try out? How should I give this any credence if I cannot evaluate them?
Go to their resume from the home page, https://docs.google.com/document/d/17Ql6AydCJ7-XhjrwEqzmRAaA...
None of that looks like stuff I can try. I guess the GitHub copilot onboarding was pretty good. Gists are pretty good, but I don’t think he made those originally.
Thus the discussion in the article around stakeholders and what constitutes "shipping". A lot of what one will work on at a big company does not directly translate into features that regular users will see.
It's more work, NDAs, and probably not particularly relevant to the article. Why list some of them?