Comment by bananapub 10 months ago worth noting that twitter account is not the most trustworthy or independent. 10 comments bananapub Reply hersko 10 months ago What have they posted that was wrong? ceejayoz 10 months ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_24#Content details a number of cases. mistermann 10 months ago It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing. 5 replies → wslh 10 months ago [flagged]
hersko 10 months ago What have they posted that was wrong? ceejayoz 10 months ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_24#Content details a number of cases. mistermann 10 months ago It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing. 5 replies → wslh 10 months ago [flagged]
ceejayoz 10 months ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_24#Content details a number of cases. mistermann 10 months ago It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing. 5 replies → wslh 10 months ago [flagged]
mistermann 10 months ago It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing. 5 replies →
What have they posted that was wrong?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_24#Content details a number of cases.
It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.
Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing.
5 replies →
[flagged]