← Back to context Comment by bananapub 14 days ago worth noting that twitter account is not the most trustworthy or independent. 10 comments bananapub Reply hersko 14 days ago What have they posted that was wrong? ceejayoz 14 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_24#Content details a number of cases. mistermann 14 days ago It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing. 5 replies → wslh 14 days ago [flagged]
hersko 14 days ago What have they posted that was wrong? ceejayoz 14 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_24#Content details a number of cases. mistermann 14 days ago It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing. 5 replies → wslh 14 days ago [flagged]
ceejayoz 14 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_24#Content details a number of cases. mistermann 14 days ago It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing. 5 replies → wslh 14 days ago [flagged]
mistermann 14 days ago It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing. 5 replies →
What have they posted that was wrong?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_24#Content details a number of cases.
It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.
Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing.
5 replies →
[flagged]