← Back to context Comment by bananapub 1 year ago worth noting that twitter account is not the most trustworthy or independent. 10 comments bananapub Reply hersko 1 year ago What have they posted that was wrong? ceejayoz 1 year ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_24#Content details a number of cases. mistermann 1 year ago It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing. 5 replies → wslh 1 year ago [flagged]
hersko 1 year ago What have they posted that was wrong? ceejayoz 1 year ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_24#Content details a number of cases. mistermann 1 year ago It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing. 5 replies → wslh 1 year ago [flagged]
ceejayoz 1 year ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_24#Content details a number of cases. mistermann 1 year ago It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing. 5 replies → wslh 1 year ago [flagged]
mistermann 1 year ago It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing. 5 replies →
What have they posted that was wrong?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegr%C3%A1d_24#Content details a number of cases.
It would be useful to have a site that logs all plausible issues of this kind, at arm's length from Wikipedia editors.
Kind of a "Who watches the watchers?" type of thing.
5 replies →
[flagged]