Comment by n2d4
16 hours ago
The original title was not poorly worded though. The new one was editorialized to get a certain reaction out of readers — I promise you the responses on this thread would look different with the original title.
16 hours ago
The original title was not poorly worded though. The new one was editorialized to get a certain reaction out of readers — I promise you the responses on this thread would look different with the original title.
The original title fails to explain who is building the model and where the data is coming from. It also implies a discussion of the task of training models, whereas the actual page is an announcement of an intent to train a model.