Comment by fmajid 13 days ago https://xkcd.com/1987/https://xkcd.com/927/ 3 comments fmajid Reply teroshan 13 days ago `uv` is not a new standard though, just a wrapper. tspng 13 days ago `uv` is definitely not a wrapper. It's written from scratch. If you mean by wrapper that it's mostly compatible with pip (using `uv pip`), that's one of their adoption strategies to make it easier to switch to. But it does a lot more than that. wasyl 13 days ago I mean, it's right there as the first highlight in the docs> A single tool to replace pip, pip-tools, pipx, poetry, pyenv, twine, virtualenv, and more.
teroshan 13 days ago `uv` is not a new standard though, just a wrapper. tspng 13 days ago `uv` is definitely not a wrapper. It's written from scratch. If you mean by wrapper that it's mostly compatible with pip (using `uv pip`), that's one of their adoption strategies to make it easier to switch to. But it does a lot more than that. wasyl 13 days ago I mean, it's right there as the first highlight in the docs> A single tool to replace pip, pip-tools, pipx, poetry, pyenv, twine, virtualenv, and more.
tspng 13 days ago `uv` is definitely not a wrapper. It's written from scratch. If you mean by wrapper that it's mostly compatible with pip (using `uv pip`), that's one of their adoption strategies to make it easier to switch to. But it does a lot more than that.
wasyl 13 days ago I mean, it's right there as the first highlight in the docs> A single tool to replace pip, pip-tools, pipx, poetry, pyenv, twine, virtualenv, and more.
`uv` is not a new standard though, just a wrapper.
`uv` is definitely not a wrapper. It's written from scratch. If you mean by wrapper that it's mostly compatible with pip (using `uv pip`), that's one of their adoption strategies to make it easier to switch to. But it does a lot more than that.
I mean, it's right there as the first highlight in the docs
> A single tool to replace pip, pip-tools, pipx, poetry, pyenv, twine, virtualenv, and more.