Comment by taylorius 1 year ago I wonder if this would work for python. 4 comments taylorius Reply chc4 1 year ago CPython merged[0] an experimental JIT compiler into mainline based on the author's previous paper, Copy-and-Patch0: https://peps.python.org/pep-0744/ ivoflipse 1 year ago The Faster CPython team at least is aware of the paper and probably will look into ithttps://github.com/faster-cpython/ideas/issues/707 082349872349872 1 year ago do you mean more specifically than the generally similar approach that worked for https://pypy.org ? tekknolagi 1 year ago ~~It didn't work; PyPy moved away from partial evaluation years ago~~Sorry, I think I was responding to completely the wrong comment. I would also like a more general-purpose tool for writing fast programming language implementations
chc4 1 year ago CPython merged[0] an experimental JIT compiler into mainline based on the author's previous paper, Copy-and-Patch0: https://peps.python.org/pep-0744/
ivoflipse 1 year ago The Faster CPython team at least is aware of the paper and probably will look into ithttps://github.com/faster-cpython/ideas/issues/707
082349872349872 1 year ago do you mean more specifically than the generally similar approach that worked for https://pypy.org ? tekknolagi 1 year ago ~~It didn't work; PyPy moved away from partial evaluation years ago~~Sorry, I think I was responding to completely the wrong comment. I would also like a more general-purpose tool for writing fast programming language implementations
tekknolagi 1 year ago ~~It didn't work; PyPy moved away from partial evaluation years ago~~Sorry, I think I was responding to completely the wrong comment. I would also like a more general-purpose tool for writing fast programming language implementations
CPython merged[0] an experimental JIT compiler into mainline based on the author's previous paper, Copy-and-Patch
0: https://peps.python.org/pep-0744/
The Faster CPython team at least is aware of the paper and probably will look into it
https://github.com/faster-cpython/ideas/issues/707
do you mean more specifically than the generally similar approach that worked for https://pypy.org ?
~~It didn't work; PyPy moved away from partial evaluation years ago~~
Sorry, I think I was responding to completely the wrong comment. I would also like a more general-purpose tool for writing fast programming language implementations