Comment by IshKebab
1 year ago
Yeah that's exactly what I was saying. So what word would you use to mean "dynamically typed without static type annotations"?
> your tools yell at junior developers.
Oh you're one of those...
1 year ago
Yeah that's exactly what I was saying. So what word would you use to mean "dynamically typed without static type annotations"?
> your tools yell at junior developers.
Oh you're one of those...
> one of those...
If by one of those you mean a solopreneur who doesn't have any junior devs to yell at then yes. If I wanted to use static types I'd use an actual statically typed language with all of the performance benefits (Go, Java, Rust, Haskell, Ocaml, etc...).
Using a dynamically typed/interpreted language with type annotations is literally the worst of all worlds...