Comment by dralley
2 years ago
It's not at all a bold claim. The founder of the Oath Keepers was convicted, tried, and found guilty of "seditious conspiracy" in a court of law.
You are are either lying, or guilty of severe inattention, if you go around claiming that "all the evidence we have seen" shows that. e.g.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/oath-kee...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iludfj6Pe7w <- That's a forcible breach, not "being let through"
The comment you are replying to states that some of the rioters had assistance entering and being led through the building - this has been shown on video multiple times. Others forcibly entering does not preclude that occurrence.
[flagged]
Your rebuttal seems to be "but the leader wasn't packing heat (alongside all of his underlings who were)". I would counter that if the leader has a bunch of people around him with guns, whether they themselves personally were carrying guns doesn't matter that much.