Comment by ddoeth
1 year ago
Maybe the difference is that you used O1 that has access to the internet, and the other users might not have.
1 year ago
Maybe the difference is that you used O1 that has access to the internet, and the other users might not have.
It seems like the biggest difference is that the book is about bone people and is actually called Bone People.
A triumph of LLM literalism. It never have occurred to me that that might literally have been the title. Googling "bone people" or "bone people children's book" doesn't work; the SERPs are flooded by a different novel that won the Booker in 1986, interesting zero six-year-olds. But "bone people science fiction" does work!
I read (er, reread) it last night using the book-borrowing feature of archive.org which got them existentially sued: https://archive.org/details/bonepeople0000unse/. The mind-reading business hardly figures in the action; it's there, but marginal. The humans actually defeat the bone people by kicking one of them in the head (er, skull) and then blasting them with an air gun. Literally an air gun: it shoots air, and it turns out that air kills bone people. That was lucky!
I remain of the opinion that defeating mind-readers by keeping one's thoughts in the back of one's mind is the most interesting thing about the book, so it's not surprising that was what stuck in my mind, though not so much in the back. It's been in a trunk in the middle somewhere.
For anybody else playing the home game like I am, this is an easier read than Bruno Schulz "Street Of Crocodiles".
Later
No, that's not quite fair; you get halfway into this and it starts to be written like the Hadiths. "The Bone People do not think about a thing but what it is an evil thought." I'm always saying!
2 replies →