Comment by Gormo 10 months ago What you're seeing might be a smudge on your glasses. Legally, there is no such difference. 14 comments Gormo Reply oharapj 10 months ago And legal differences are the only differences that exist, right? Gormo 10 months ago In relation to something that is entirely a legal construct (i.e. copyright) in the first place? Yes. oharapj 10 months ago Just because there's currently no legal basis for something does not mean that the perspective that it shouldn't happen is invalid 10 replies → bazoom42 10 months ago Some jurisdiction have the concept of “moral rights”.
oharapj 10 months ago And legal differences are the only differences that exist, right? Gormo 10 months ago In relation to something that is entirely a legal construct (i.e. copyright) in the first place? Yes. oharapj 10 months ago Just because there's currently no legal basis for something does not mean that the perspective that it shouldn't happen is invalid 10 replies → bazoom42 10 months ago Some jurisdiction have the concept of “moral rights”.
Gormo 10 months ago In relation to something that is entirely a legal construct (i.e. copyright) in the first place? Yes. oharapj 10 months ago Just because there's currently no legal basis for something does not mean that the perspective that it shouldn't happen is invalid 10 replies → bazoom42 10 months ago Some jurisdiction have the concept of “moral rights”.
oharapj 10 months ago Just because there's currently no legal basis for something does not mean that the perspective that it shouldn't happen is invalid 10 replies →
And legal differences are the only differences that exist, right?
In relation to something that is entirely a legal construct (i.e. copyright) in the first place? Yes.
Just because there's currently no legal basis for something does not mean that the perspective that it shouldn't happen is invalid
10 replies →
Some jurisdiction have the concept of “moral rights”.