Comment by Gormo 5 months ago What you're seeing might be a smudge on your glasses. Legally, there is no such difference. 14 comments Gormo Reply oharapj 5 months ago And legal differences are the only differences that exist, right? Gormo 5 months ago In relation to something that is entirely a legal construct (i.e. copyright) in the first place? Yes. oharapj 5 months ago Just because there's currently no legal basis for something does not mean that the perspective that it shouldn't happen is invalid 10 replies → bazoom42 5 months ago Some jurisdiction have the concept of “moral rights”.
oharapj 5 months ago And legal differences are the only differences that exist, right? Gormo 5 months ago In relation to something that is entirely a legal construct (i.e. copyright) in the first place? Yes. oharapj 5 months ago Just because there's currently no legal basis for something does not mean that the perspective that it shouldn't happen is invalid 10 replies → bazoom42 5 months ago Some jurisdiction have the concept of “moral rights”.
Gormo 5 months ago In relation to something that is entirely a legal construct (i.e. copyright) in the first place? Yes. oharapj 5 months ago Just because there's currently no legal basis for something does not mean that the perspective that it shouldn't happen is invalid 10 replies → bazoom42 5 months ago Some jurisdiction have the concept of “moral rights”.
oharapj 5 months ago Just because there's currently no legal basis for something does not mean that the perspective that it shouldn't happen is invalid 10 replies →
And legal differences are the only differences that exist, right?
In relation to something that is entirely a legal construct (i.e. copyright) in the first place? Yes.
Just because there's currently no legal basis for something does not mean that the perspective that it shouldn't happen is invalid
10 replies →
Some jurisdiction have the concept of “moral rights”.