Comment by pinkmuffinere 2 years ago Forgive me — what’s a prig? 4 comments pinkmuffinere Reply MarkSweep 2 years ago It is defined in the first two sentences of the article. I’ll duplicate those sentences here:> The word "prig" isn't very common now, but if you look up the definition, it will sound familiar. Google's isn't bad:>> A self-righteously moralistic person who behaves as if superior to others. malcolmgreaves 2 years ago [flagged] felipemesquita 2 years ago From the article’s first couple sentences: > The word "prig" isn't very common now, but if you look up the definition, it will sound familiar. Google's isn't bad: A self-righteously moralistic person who behaves as if superior to others. pinkmuffinere 2 years ago Ah sorry, I should have checked the article before posting
MarkSweep 2 years ago It is defined in the first two sentences of the article. I’ll duplicate those sentences here:> The word "prig" isn't very common now, but if you look up the definition, it will sound familiar. Google's isn't bad:>> A self-righteously moralistic person who behaves as if superior to others. malcolmgreaves 2 years ago [flagged]
felipemesquita 2 years ago From the article’s first couple sentences: > The word "prig" isn't very common now, but if you look up the definition, it will sound familiar. Google's isn't bad: A self-righteously moralistic person who behaves as if superior to others. pinkmuffinere 2 years ago Ah sorry, I should have checked the article before posting
It is defined in the first two sentences of the article. I’ll duplicate those sentences here:
> The word "prig" isn't very common now, but if you look up the definition, it will sound familiar. Google's isn't bad:
>> A self-righteously moralistic person who behaves as if superior to others.
[flagged]
From the article’s first couple sentences: > The word "prig" isn't very common now, but if you look up the definition, it will sound familiar. Google's isn't bad: A self-righteously moralistic person who behaves as if superior to others.
Ah sorry, I should have checked the article before posting