Comment by ForOldHack

I am not making this up from thin air, I actually cited a post on another server, that has an actual example. I would hesitate to post a Rule 34 example, as it would appeal to prurient interests, but I will just so I can show effective counter examples.

The original intent of the copyright law is now of little interest and little use in the onslaught of A.I.. A.I. Cannot survive without a relaxing of the copyright laws:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/jan/08/ai-tools-...

Copyright law may have been created early on to promote progress, through profits, but now, in the wake of both the SCO Group lawsuits:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO_Group,_Inc._v._Novell,_Inc.

I would disagree with your use of the term "Gentrification." As gentrification implies "Gentrification is a process that occurs when a community's values and profits are raised, often displacing long-time residents. The term was coined in 1964 by British sociologist Ruth Glass." raising the values... where as A.I. may just result in the perversion of the values and destroy the profits.