Comment by antifa

5 days ago

You can make arguments against people you disagree with without using rhetoric that self-identifies oneself as 'fa'. Most 'fa' strangely chose not to.

To be clear: the comment I'm replying to is a thinly veiled (if snark can be considered a veil) accusation of the GP being a fascist. This is apparently based on pointing out that groups of people don't always have names that accurately reflect their actions, from an outside view. I don't understand how this is supposed to follow logically.