← Back to context

Comment by eptcyka

4 days ago

In short, if it tastes nice and was man-processed, it probably will be bad for you?

That's a good first-order approximation, but is missing some nuance.

An example they use is eggs: Pan-fried eggs are listed as high in AGEs, whereas scrambled eggs aren't. Admittedly my diet isn't the best, but I wouldn't have expected a meaningful difference between ordering my eggs scrambled vs sunnyside-up.

Or for meat, stewed meat would be healthier than roasted meat.

I'm suddenly curious about coffee, now that they mention it...

Well, it was good for us when we first tamed fire, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

Ain't greater modern cargo cult than "healthy food".

  • People didn’t live very long when we first tamed fire - not because of diet, but because something else in nature would eventually get you first. So it didn’t really matter what early humans ate as long as it gave them immediate energy.

    People only needed to live long enough to reproduce, and that’s what our bodies are optimized for. Most people would prefer to live longer, though. ;)