Comment by azernik 1 year ago The "misogyny" that article purports is just... being publicly trans. 2 comments azernik Reply blasorast 1 year ago Exactly. It's fundamentally misogynistic for these men to appropriate a "woman" identity, and Mulvaney is a very typical example of this.Think about it. If you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist stereotypes? azernik 1 year ago No
blasorast 1 year ago Exactly. It's fundamentally misogynistic for these men to appropriate a "woman" identity, and Mulvaney is a very typical example of this.Think about it. If you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist stereotypes? azernik 1 year ago No
Exactly. It's fundamentally misogynistic for these men to appropriate a "woman" identity, and Mulvaney is a very typical example of this.
Think about it. If you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist stereotypes?
No