← Back to context Comment by azernik 17 days ago The "misogyny" that article purports is just... being publicly trans. 2 comments azernik Reply blasorast 17 days ago Exactly. It's fundamentally misogynistic for these men to appropriate a "woman" identity, and Mulvaney is a very typical example of this.Think about it. If you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist stereotypes? azernik 16 days ago No
blasorast 17 days ago Exactly. It's fundamentally misogynistic for these men to appropriate a "woman" identity, and Mulvaney is a very typical example of this.Think about it. If you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist stereotypes? azernik 16 days ago No
Exactly. It's fundamentally misogynistic for these men to appropriate a "woman" identity, and Mulvaney is a very typical example of this.
Think about it. If you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist stereotypes?
No