← Back to context Comment by azernik 10 months ago The "misogyny" that article purports is just... being publicly trans. 2 comments azernik Reply blasorast 10 months ago Exactly. It's fundamentally misogynistic for these men to appropriate a "woman" identity, and Mulvaney is a very typical example of this.Think about it. If you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist stereotypes? azernik 10 months ago No
blasorast 10 months ago Exactly. It's fundamentally misogynistic for these men to appropriate a "woman" identity, and Mulvaney is a very typical example of this.Think about it. If you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist stereotypes? azernik 10 months ago No
Exactly. It's fundamentally misogynistic for these men to appropriate a "woman" identity, and Mulvaney is a very typical example of this.
Think about it. If you remove the female body from the definition of woman, what else remains besides sexist stereotypes?
No