Comment by robertlagrant 3 days ago Yes, but if it's one of his goals, then bringing him in isn't going to reverse it. 2 comments robertlagrant Reply ceejayoz 3 days ago He's both a "no dyes in food" activist and a "vaccines bad" activist. Both are goals of his.I'd rather have vaccines and dyes than no vaccines and no dyes. robertlagrant 3 days ago Okay, but that seems irrelevant to this thread. What you're getting is RFK, and he doesn't like dyes in food. So as I understand it the original claim is false, and that's all this thread is trying to address.
ceejayoz 3 days ago He's both a "no dyes in food" activist and a "vaccines bad" activist. Both are goals of his.I'd rather have vaccines and dyes than no vaccines and no dyes. robertlagrant 3 days ago Okay, but that seems irrelevant to this thread. What you're getting is RFK, and he doesn't like dyes in food. So as I understand it the original claim is false, and that's all this thread is trying to address.
robertlagrant 3 days ago Okay, but that seems irrelevant to this thread. What you're getting is RFK, and he doesn't like dyes in food. So as I understand it the original claim is false, and that's all this thread is trying to address.
He's both a "no dyes in food" activist and a "vaccines bad" activist. Both are goals of his.
I'd rather have vaccines and dyes than no vaccines and no dyes.
Okay, but that seems irrelevant to this thread. What you're getting is RFK, and he doesn't like dyes in food. So as I understand it the original claim is false, and that's all this thread is trying to address.