>This isn't debunking anything considering that the report itself agrees: "A combination of chaos, enormous grief and Jewish religious duties meant that many bodies were buried as quickly as possible [...]"
It is debunked with the provided evidence and you just stating that it was "chaos" doesnt fix any of listed flaws and enormous bias of that article
>You might be thinking of Gal's brother-in-law, but the report was never based on the opinions of family members, it was based on conversations with police and video evidence: "Based largely on the video evidence — which was verified by The New York Times — Israeli police officials said they believed that Ms. Abdush was raped"
There was no forensic evidence and what anyone "believes" is irrelevant and would not hold up in a court of law as stated. Israeli officials are as trustworthy as Nazi officials and would claim anything to demonize Palestinians and to justify the israeli occupation.
>He wasn't the lead reporter. That was Jeffrey Gettleman, a Pulitzer recipient.
Anat Schwarz is a woman and she was part of israeli military intelligence. Jeffrey being a "pulitzer recipient" is an appeal to authority and doesnt fix any of the methodological flaws of NYT's propaganda article either.
>This isn't debunking anything considering that the report itself agrees: "A combination of chaos, enormous grief and Jewish religious duties meant that many bodies were buried as quickly as possible [...]"
It is debunked with the provided evidence and you just stating that it was "chaos" doesnt fix any of listed flaws and enormous bias of that article
>You might be thinking of Gal's brother-in-law, but the report was never based on the opinions of family members, it was based on conversations with police and video evidence: "Based largely on the video evidence — which was verified by The New York Times — Israeli police officials said they believed that Ms. Abdush was raped"
There was no forensic evidence and what anyone "believes" is irrelevant and would not hold up in a court of law as stated. Israeli officials are as trustworthy as Nazi officials and would claim anything to demonize Palestinians and to justify the israeli occupation.
>He wasn't the lead reporter. That was Jeffrey Gettleman, a Pulitzer recipient.
Anat Schwarz is a woman and she was part of israeli military intelligence. Jeffrey being a "pulitzer recipient" is an appeal to authority and doesnt fix any of the methodological flaws of NYT's propaganda article either.
More on it can be read in the intercept article: https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schw...
[flagged]