Comment by baq
2 days ago
It helps that Intel has been contributing to OSS since forever, they have good internal processes established and some orgs develop/contribute to OSS pretty much exclusively.
2 days ago
It helps that Intel has been contributing to OSS since forever, they have good internal processes established and some orgs develop/contribute to OSS pretty much exclusively.
I think the biggest contributor to these processes was going open source in their graphics drivers.
They went from "we have tons of 3rd party IP in these!" to, "you don't need to download anything, it's in kernel mainline now" in a generation and they're off to the races after that.
Maybe their Ethernet drivers were open before that, I don't remember but, video drivers made them pass a threshold in maturity IMHO.
Intel embraced Linux when they bet big in datacenters in early 2002. The momentum they got from there, with Linux dominating the sector, made them realize how much of a benefit it is to have a free software stack. With Linux they were able to go head to head with the incumbents of the day.
Linux and x86 became unbeatable in the space for 20 years.
They have known how important it is. They won't forget.
Yes, however, they first made their hardware standard compliant rather than making their driver open source.
The open source part came later, starting with CPU and chipset support, then Ethernet, then GPUs IIRC.
The biggest and sweetest side-effect is Desktop/Personal use Linux support as long as the hardware doesn't do anything janky, or too janky.
1 reply →
The ethernet ones were big for awhile, I can remember when you wanted to go out of your way to get something that worked with the e1000 driver if you wanted reliable, usable gigabit.
> they have good internal processes established
There are a good number of people that would LOL at this statement, myself included.
Maybe they have such processes now, because at one point . . . Well “mistakes were made”.