Comment by ReptileMan 10 months ago [flagged] 5 comments ReptileMan Reply 9dev 10 months ago was that understanding formed by Fox News, perhaps? throwup238 10 months ago Rush Limbaugh zombie in a polkadot dress. ReptileMan 10 months ago Didn't know that fox news was in charge of forestry in LA. 9dev 10 months ago Nope. Last time I checked, they were in the business of spewing hate and misinformation (sorry: Alternative facts), undermining any sensible discussion.Accusing thousands of people of being incompetent is more telling of you than them. 1 reply →
9dev 10 months ago was that understanding formed by Fox News, perhaps? throwup238 10 months ago Rush Limbaugh zombie in a polkadot dress. ReptileMan 10 months ago Didn't know that fox news was in charge of forestry in LA. 9dev 10 months ago Nope. Last time I checked, they were in the business of spewing hate and misinformation (sorry: Alternative facts), undermining any sensible discussion.Accusing thousands of people of being incompetent is more telling of you than them. 1 reply →
ReptileMan 10 months ago Didn't know that fox news was in charge of forestry in LA. 9dev 10 months ago Nope. Last time I checked, they were in the business of spewing hate and misinformation (sorry: Alternative facts), undermining any sensible discussion.Accusing thousands of people of being incompetent is more telling of you than them. 1 reply →
9dev 10 months ago Nope. Last time I checked, they were in the business of spewing hate and misinformation (sorry: Alternative facts), undermining any sensible discussion.Accusing thousands of people of being incompetent is more telling of you than them. 1 reply →
was that understanding formed by Fox News, perhaps?
Rush Limbaugh zombie in a polkadot dress.
Didn't know that fox news was in charge of forestry in LA.
Nope. Last time I checked, they were in the business of spewing hate and misinformation (sorry: Alternative facts), undermining any sensible discussion.
Accusing thousands of people of being incompetent is more telling of you than them.
1 reply →