Comment by ethbr1 10 hours ago https://archive.ph/20241007181947/https://www.wsj.com/politi...https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/30/us/politics/china-hack-tr... 3 comments ethbr1 Reply jampekka 9 hours ago NYT would of course never back erroneous allegations by US officials on geopolitical matters like these. ethbr1 9 hours ago What satisfiable criteria would you like in a source? bjourne 2 hours ago Read the sources carefully. It all boils down to "US officials says so". It's different from the Podesta hack as forensic evidence were published linking Russian hackers to the attack.
jampekka 9 hours ago NYT would of course never back erroneous allegations by US officials on geopolitical matters like these. ethbr1 9 hours ago What satisfiable criteria would you like in a source? bjourne 2 hours ago Read the sources carefully. It all boils down to "US officials says so". It's different from the Podesta hack as forensic evidence were published linking Russian hackers to the attack.
ethbr1 9 hours ago What satisfiable criteria would you like in a source? bjourne 2 hours ago Read the sources carefully. It all boils down to "US officials says so". It's different from the Podesta hack as forensic evidence were published linking Russian hackers to the attack.
bjourne 2 hours ago Read the sources carefully. It all boils down to "US officials says so". It's different from the Podesta hack as forensic evidence were published linking Russian hackers to the attack.
NYT would of course never back erroneous allegations by US officials on geopolitical matters like these.
What satisfiable criteria would you like in a source?
Read the sources carefully. It all boils down to "US officials says so". It's different from the Podesta hack as forensic evidence were published linking Russian hackers to the attack.