Comment by airstrike 3 months ago The Supreme Court doesn't. 10 comments airstrike Reply garbagewoman 3 months ago The supreme court says a lot of things. airstrike 3 months ago So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final. Spivak 3 months ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 3 replies → HDThoreaun 3 months ago And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says. cute_boi 3 months ago Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased. monocularvision 3 months ago What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”? Fidelix 3 months ago Yeah, and the EFF is in no way biased. at all.
garbagewoman 3 months ago The supreme court says a lot of things. airstrike 3 months ago So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final. Spivak 3 months ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 3 replies → HDThoreaun 3 months ago And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says.
airstrike 3 months ago So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final. Spivak 3 months ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 3 replies →
Spivak 3 months ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 3 replies →
cute_boi 3 months ago Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased. monocularvision 3 months ago What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”? Fidelix 3 months ago Yeah, and the EFF is in no way biased. at all.
monocularvision 3 months ago What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”?
The supreme court says a lot of things.
So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final.
Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.
It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones.
3 replies →
And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says.
Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased.
What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”?
Yeah, and the EFF is in no way biased. at all.