← Back to context Comment by airstrike 6 hours ago The Supreme Court doesn't. 8 comments airstrike Reply garbagewoman 6 hours ago The supreme court says a lot of things. airstrike 6 hours ago So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final. Spivak 5 hours ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 2 replies → HDThoreaun 4 hours ago And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says. cute_boi 4 hours ago Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased. monocularvision 2 hours ago What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”?
garbagewoman 6 hours ago The supreme court says a lot of things. airstrike 6 hours ago So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final. Spivak 5 hours ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 2 replies → HDThoreaun 4 hours ago And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says.
airstrike 6 hours ago So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final. Spivak 5 hours ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 2 replies →
Spivak 5 hours ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 2 replies →
cute_boi 4 hours ago Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased. monocularvision 2 hours ago What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”?
monocularvision 2 hours ago What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”?
The supreme court says a lot of things.
So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final.
Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.
It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones.
2 replies →
And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says.
Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased.
What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”?