← Back to context Comment by airstrike 10 months ago The Supreme Court doesn't. 10 comments airstrike Reply garbagewoman 10 months ago The supreme court says a lot of things. airstrike 10 months ago So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final. Spivak 10 months ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 3 replies → HDThoreaun 10 months ago And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says. cute_boi 10 months ago Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased. monocularvision 10 months ago What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”? Fidelix 10 months ago Yeah, and the EFF is in no way biased. at all.
garbagewoman 10 months ago The supreme court says a lot of things. airstrike 10 months ago So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final. Spivak 10 months ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 3 replies → HDThoreaun 10 months ago And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says.
airstrike 10 months ago So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final. Spivak 10 months ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 3 replies →
Spivak 10 months ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 3 replies →
cute_boi 10 months ago Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased. monocularvision 10 months ago What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”? Fidelix 10 months ago Yeah, and the EFF is in no way biased. at all.
monocularvision 10 months ago What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”?
The supreme court says a lot of things.
So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final.
Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.
It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones.
3 replies →
And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says.
Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased.
What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”?
Yeah, and the EFF is in no way biased. at all.