← Back to context Comment by airstrike 2 years ago The Supreme Court doesn't. 10 comments airstrike Reply garbagewoman 2 years ago The supreme court says a lot of things. airstrike 2 years ago So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final. Spivak 2 years ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 3 replies → HDThoreaun 2 years ago And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says. cute_boi 2 years ago Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased. monocularvision 2 years ago What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”? Fidelix 2 years ago Yeah, and the EFF is in no way biased. at all.
garbagewoman 2 years ago The supreme court says a lot of things. airstrike 2 years ago So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final. Spivak 2 years ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 3 replies → HDThoreaun 2 years ago And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says.
airstrike 2 years ago So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final. Spivak 2 years ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 3 replies →
Spivak 2 years ago Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones. 3 replies →
cute_boi 2 years ago Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased. monocularvision 2 years ago What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”? Fidelix 2 years ago Yeah, and the EFF is in no way biased. at all.
monocularvision 2 years ago What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”?
The supreme court says a lot of things.
So does the EFF, but they have no say in legal matters, so their opinion here is irrelevant, whereas the Supreme Court's opinion is final.
Sure but even the supreme court disagrees with the supreme court. Treating their rulings as the best or canonical interpretation of a case doesn't make much sense.
It's not like any interpretation is valid but there are plenty of valid ones.
3 replies →
And what they say matters a whole lot more than what the eff says.
Just because Supreme court said it doesn't mean they aren't heavily biased.
What exactly do you mean here by using the term “biased”? In what way is the Supreme Court “biased”?
Yeah, and the EFF is in no way biased. at all.