You keep fixating on one half of my point (this law shouldn't exist) while completely ignoring and not addressing the rational (it does basically nothing to help children at great cost to your rights). In no way am I endorsing generating child porn, but this is a retarded way to try and prevent that.
This isn't a "slippery slope" argument, the specific law we are discussing is already an example of stepping too far.
You keep fixating on one half of my point (this law shouldn't exist) while completely ignoring and not addressing the rational (it does basically nothing to help children at great cost to your rights). In no way am I endorsing generating child porn, but this is a retarded way to try and prevent that.
This isn't a "slippery slope" argument, the specific law we are discussing is already an example of stepping too far.