Comment by jurschreuder

1 year ago

Bruno is nice because unlike postman all the calls are defined in files that you can add to the git of your project.

Only thing I don't like about Bruno is that you cannot generate a documentation from your api call tests.

Bruno was supposed to free us from the other bad guy, then they added a subscription too. Fuck Bruno I guess.

  • I find this funny from people that make their living from $$ from software! Lol

    But apart from that Bruno is open source (MIT), you can fork it and have it anyway you want…

    The paid option seems just like the traditional open source model of make software free but offer enterprise support. And given that CTOs tent to want to pay for stuff (postman is terrible nowadays but is still picked and paid for) why would Bruno straight up say no to money?

    • Open-source is about having the whole stuff, not restrictions on "Embed Bruno into your SDLC with deeper Git integration, automation."

      What I do resent is the fact that Bruno was a reaction to shitty restrictions from another application, and they did the same thing a few months/years later.

      1 reply →